Cabin & Comfort
A more comfortable, upscale place to spend your drive, supported by leather seats.

Before you compare
SX vs Trailhawk, compared on verified specifications and price.
The SX and Trailhawk are closely matched on price: $34,590 vs $34,060.
At a glance
For shoppers on this Sportage site, the Sportage SX is our pick over the Compass Trailhawk.
Close call — closely matched on price: $34,590 vs $34,060.
Compass Trailhawk makes 200 hp vs 187 hp.
Sportage SX returns 28 mpg combined vs 26 mpg.
Head to head
The verified differences most likely to decide it — each shown side by side, with the winner called out.
A more comfortable, upscale place to spend your drive, supported by leather seats.
The Sportage SX delivers lower fuel costs and fewer stops at the pump.
Closely matched: $34,590 vs $34,060.
The Sportage SX makes everyday hauling and road trips easier with more cargo room.
The Compass Trailhawk gives you stronger acceleration and easier passing.
The SX and Trailhawk are closely matched on price: $34,590 vs $34,060.
On verified numbers, the SX leads in combined mpg and cargo volume; the Trailhawk leads in horsepower and torque. What the numbers actually mean for you here: the SX's combined mpg edge (28 vs 26 mpg) means fewer stops at the pump and lower running costs over years of ownership, the Trailhawk's horsepower edge (200 vs 187 hp) shows up most when merging and passing rather than in daily commuting, the Trailhawk's torque edge (221 vs 178 lb-ft) is felt most in everyday, low-speed response, and the SX's cargo volume edge (74.1 vs 59.8 cu ft) is what decides how it handles road trips, gear, and family duty.
When it matters most: if your commute is long, the SX's combined mpg edge (28 vs 26 mpg) is worth weighting heavily; if you regularly carry more than a passenger or two of gear, the SX's cargo volume edge (74.1 vs 59.8 cu ft) may decide it.
Visual comparison


Sportage SX
Compass Trailhawk

Sportage SX




Compass Trailhawk








The bottom line
Sportage SX
For shoppers on this Sportage site, the Sportage SX is our pick over the Compass Trailhawk.
What could change this: If a better-equipped cabin matters most, the Compass Trailhawk is the better fit.
On verified numbers, the SX leads in combined mpg and cargo volume; the Trailhawk leads in horsepower and torque.
The full picture
By the numbers
These are the figures most shoppers weigh first — price, power, efficiency, and room — with the full specification table below.
| Specification | Sportage SX | Compass Trailhawk |
|---|---|---|
| Starting MSRP | $34,590 | $34,060 |
| Horsepower | 187 hp | 200 hp |
| Torque | 178 lb-ft | 221 lb-ft |
| Combined MPG | 28 mpg | 26 mpg |
| City MPG | 25 mpg | 23 mpg |
| Highway MPG | 33 mpg | 31 mpg |
| Max cargo — behind 1st row, seats folded | 74.1 cu ft | 59.8 cu ft |
| Seating | 5 | 5 |
| Drivetrain | Front Wheel Drive | Four Wheel Drive |
| Transmission | 8-Speed Automatic | — |
Make the call
Best for:
Best for:
Good to know
The questions shoppers ask most when weighing these two — answered with the verified facts.
Value comes down to the details. The SX and Trailhawk are closely matched on price: $34,590 vs $34,060. Weigh the standard equipment each includes, their fuel economy, and the features you'll genuinely use. Cross-shop comparably equipped trims and let local incentives settle it.
"Nicer every day" is about the things you touch on every drive — the seats, the controls, and the screen. Comfort is personal, though: seat shape, driving position, and how intuitive the controls feel to you matter more than any feature list. Spend ten minutes in each on a route like your real commute — that test drive will tell you more about daily livability than any spec comparison.
We don't publish a feature-by-feature equipment comparison for this exact pairing, so we won't claim either way. Use the verified specifications and the verdict above — those come from confirmed data — and check each manufacturer's build-and-price tool for the equipment on the exact SX and Trailhawk you're considering. Equipment also moves with option packages and model year, so the trim you drive may not match a general list. A back-to-back test drive of the two specific cars you're shopping is the reliable way to see what one offers that the other doesn't.
High annual mileage puts the spotlight on running costs, and that's mostly about fuel. Here, the Sportage SX returns the better EPA-estimated economy (28 mpg combined) — over 15,000 miles a year that adds up to noticeably fewer fill-ups and real money saved versus the alternative. Beyond fuel, a high-mileage driver should weigh seat comfort for all those hours and each model's reliability record — worth checking current ratings for the specific trims, since it matters most when you're piling on miles. If your year is mostly highway commuting, lean toward the more efficient, more comfortable choice; the small differences compound over 15,000 miles in a way they wouldn't for a light-use second car.
On space, expect more cargo room in the Sportage SX. Interior preference is partly personal — dashboard layout, seat shape, and where the controls fall all factor in — so the best test is to sit in both. If a richer, more feature-laden cabin matters to you, compare the specific trims' option packages directly; if you mainly want a comfortable, sensibly-arranged space, either will serve you well day to day.
For most shoppers, the right pick follows your priorities rather than a single score. If running costs lead, the Sportage SX's efficiency is the draw. Use the verdict above as the starting recommendation, then confirm it with a back-to-back test drive of the exact trims you're considering.
Find local inventory, pricing, incentives, and available trims near you.
Updated inventory from local dealers.